By now you have likely read news reports of rising COVID infections from the new “Eris” variant across the country— and around the world.

With some of those reports come warnings about the reinstatement of mask mandates, lockdowns and the renewed push for COVID-19 booster shots.

Our physicians say ALL of these measures are wholly unnecessary; and that there is no need whatsoever to panic.

“Pay no mind to the ongoing drumbeat of fear-mongering that the mainstream media is providing,” say FLCCC front line doctors Yusuf “JP” Saleeby and Keith Berkowitz writing on Substack. “We know the routine. We’ve been here before.”

We certainly have.

The good news is that the advice we’ve been sharing from the FLCCC all along still stands — do what you can to prevent getting ill and if you do get it, treat immediately. Early treatment is critical.

While the “Eris” variant can be highly contagious, Drs. Saleeby and Berkowitz both report that this strain of the virus is less virulent. “It’s a lot like the Omicron variants we’ve seen recently,” they note. “Lots of cases, but not a lot of extreme illness or hospitalization.”

BOTTOM LINE: If you’ve been following the FLCCC for a while, much of this will sound familiar. Our early treatment protocol is still the right place to start when COVID comes to call.

⭐️⭐️⭐️ MARK YOUR CALENDARS! We will provide the latest updates on the new strain of COVID along with simple prevention and treatment strategies on the FLCCC WEEKLY WEBINAR this Wednesday, August 30 at 7 PM ET. Dr. Kory will lead the discussion with front line providers including Dr. J.P. Saleeby and Nurse Practitioners Scott Marsland and India Scott. REGISTER HERE! ⭐️⭐️⭐️

“First the FDA admits that ivermectin can legally be used to treat COVID. Now the Malaysian High Court says the same. I hope it is true that what always comes out are the sun, the moon, and the Truth.” —Dr. Pierre Kory

It certainly appears that the truth of ivermectin’s data-proven ability to effectively treat every phase of COVID-19 infection is seeing the light of day.

In an appellate court hearing on a lawsuit filed on behalf of Drs. Robert Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul Marik, the attorney for the FDA told the three-judge panel that the FDA never told doctors they could not prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19—and that it recognizes the right of doctors to prescribe ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. (Those are “FAKE FACTS.” John Campbell’s review of the FDA’s claims is HERE. He remarked, “Has there been deliberate misinformation from this body?”) ***

We can answer that. You betcha.

Now, the Malaysian Court of Appeals has upheld the right and autonomy of doctors to dispense ivermectin or any other medicine to treat patients, even if it goes against Health Ministry prohibition. They also cautioned that interference by government in the doctor-patient relationship will not be tolerated—and highlighted the patient’s right to choose their own treatment.

Hooray!! This MAJOR progress, wouldn’t you say?
•On Aug. 21, 2021, the FDA posted this on Twitter: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” The post linked to an FDA page that says people shouldn’t use ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19. As many of you are aware, that post went viral.
•The FDA said that ivermectin “isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.” In an online forum, the question was asked, “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19?” The FDA’s answer? “No.”

In a blistering Substack about the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM) efforts to strip Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik of their board certifications, Dr. Kory does not hold back. (When does he ever?)

“Recently, what I call the “misinformation committee” of the American Board of Internal Medicine voted to strip Professor Paul Marik and myself of our Board certifications,” he writes. “The ABIM appears absurdly obsessed with getting doctors to spout only consensus opinions. This is literally unprecedented in science.”

Indeed. Dr. Kory goes on to say that the ABIM’s history proves that their unwarranted actions are both political and financial — and very much NOT scientific. “They are making examples of us ‘dissenters’ to scare the rest of the country’s docs to keep quiet.”

FLCCC attorney Alan Dumoff wrote the following to ABIM:

A diplomate’s medical positions must be plainly erroneous to merit sanction. Departure from consensus is hardly unusual and by itself insufficient. While the Sanctions Notice gives the appearance of having done so, the Committee did not directly engage the numerous imperfections in the mainstream approach Drs. Kory and Marik’s have pointed to in substantial detail. The Committee has not engaged the evidence submitted and demonstrated it is illegitimate, only that it departs from the consensus, that is insufficient to support a sanction.

We hope you will take the time to read Dr. Kory’s eye-opening essay, which also includes his thoughts about the degradation of science in the push for “consensus science.”

Dr. Kory quotes the esteemed late author (and physician) Michael Crichton:

“The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”


A word here about this destructive notion of scientific consensus. There have been many times in medical history when consensus beliefs were proven wrong, and patients were harmed in the process because the establishment clung to a flawed premise. Read HERE about 25 times (among hundreds) that medical consensus had to be challenged and rethought for the sake of patient care.

Also, as you are able, please consider supporting our massive legal effort underway to fight the ABIM’s strong-arm tactics to vilify consensus-dissenting doctors. Your generosity is deeply appreciated. You can make make a donation of any size HERE. Many thanks. JK

This week’s