While conducting an experiment in his Boston lab in early 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan was ‘shocked’ to find that some vials of the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines with which he was working seemed to be contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA.
When McKernan repeated the experiment, he was able to confirm that the vials contained up to 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Now, other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines.
Scary, scary stuff, folks.
Sitting down with host Jan Jekielek on America’s Thought Leaders, McKernan (who published this study on DNA found in the vaccines) pulled no punches about why the high level of DNA contamination in the vaccines is so urgent and dangerous.
“The DNA in these vaccines is more likely to get to the nucleus and integrate into the genome. We have a well-known promoter (one portion of the SSV40 sequence drives transcription wherever it lands in the genome) which is used in gene therapy. That’s inside the vaccines and that’s getting injected through a Lipid Nano-Particle (LNP) —making it very effective at transecting cells. Then it has a signal in there that drives that DNA into the nucleus.
This may not be the only thing causing this turbo cancer effect that people are seeing right now. The cancers are certainly going up right now, and that’s a concern. We’re taking enormous risks right now on these vaccines where we don’t understand all the long-term consequences.”
Dr. Josh Guetzkow, a PhD graduate of Princeton in sociology and working now at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem as senior lecturer in sociology and anthropology and the institute of criminology, told nurse John Campbell that Pfizer/BioNTech’s biological product that was injected into the arms of billions was not the same one used in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch” (Guetzkow’s words) in the commercial manufacturing process that caused the DNA fragments to be present in the vaccine.
Pfizer switched the manufacturing of the product from a PCR-based process (PROCESS 1) to a new Plasmid process (PROCESS 2) — and advised the FDA that it did so. This was not a small change.
The FDA should have told Pfizer to go back and re-conduct all of the large scale clinical trials. They did not. THE PROCESS IS THE PRODUCT, and now we know that a completely new vaccine was FDA-approved and given to the public — UNTESTED — and tainted with DNA fragments.
ABOVE: German Dr. Jurgen Kirchner found DNA contamination in vaccines exceeded regulatory levels by a factor of 200-320. So he wrote to the Health Minister. This was the ministry’s reply.
“Blood clots, myocarditis, cardiac arrests, and other adverse effects are documented,” said Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University. “Many believe there’s an urgent need to quantify this problem, as DNA is itself prothrombotic and could be the cause of some of the rare but serious side effects like sudden death from cardiac arrest.”
Add to all of this the unconscionable fact that the FDA failed to do its most basic due diligence on the new shots, but instead gave pharmaceutical makers the keys to the kingdom—and continue to do so even now. Robert M. Kaplan, a faculty member at Stanford University’s Clinical Excellence Research Center, and a former associate director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote the following in Real Clear Science:
“Pfizer evaluated its new booster against other vaccines using just ten mice in each group. Moderna used only eight mice per group. Data from a few mice don’t inspire confidence the booster is ready for distribution to hundreds of millions of humans.”
The FDA knew from Pfizer and Moderna that the shots were only tested on mice. But instead of insisting upon more robust human trials, they rubber-stamped their shots and wished them a good day.
Oh my God.
As you might expect, we will be following this story very, very closely.
In the meantime, you can register for the World Council for Health’s expert webinar on the DNA contamination of the shots which will be held Monday (tomorrow, October 9) beginning at 2PM ET.
Our own Dr. Kory is a plaintiff in a new case filed in California this week. The new complaint is meant to get the district court in California to affirm that the consultation between a doctor and their patient is protected under the First Amendment. During oral arguments in a previous case, the lawyers for California claimed that the discourse between a doctor and patient was “professional speech” and not protected. However, in previous cases by the U.S. Supreme Court, this definition of “professional speech” has been struck down.
“The threat to the practice of medicine remains very real in California and many other states in the U.S. If my participation as a plaintiff can make a difference in this case, I am more than happy to do what I can to restore my profession to what it once was,” said Dr. Kory.
Just this week, California Governor Gavin Newsom repealed a law (AB2098) that disciplined doctors for not adhering to “scientific consensus” when advising patients on courses of treatment for COVID-19. The bill designated the dissemination of what it deemed to be “misinformation or disinformation” related to COVID-19 as “unprofessional conduct”— and would make findings and disciplinary declarations in that regard.
“The case has always been bigger than AB2098,” asserted Dr. Kory. “The sanctity of the relationship between doctor and patient is still under threat as governments and health authorities try to claim that the First Amendment does not apply to that relationship. In other words, according to the California legislature and medical board, I cannot perform my duty as a physician to provide deeply knowledgeable and expert informed consent to advise my patient of all the known risks of treatment if my knowledge of those risks exceeds that of bureaucrats in health agencies long known to be under regulatory capture by the pharmaceutical industry. Without the ability to exercise my First Amendment rights as a physician, there is none else with the expertise and authority to speak out about the lies and misrepresentations of an industry with such a long history of civil and criminal fines for their conduct.”
NOTE: Governor Newsom had expressed “concern” to the members of the California State Assembly when he signed the bill into law in 2022, saying, “I am concerned about the chilling effect other potential laws may have on physicians and surgeons who need to be able to effectively talk to their patients about the risks and benefits of treatments for a disease that appeared in just the last few years.”
We will follow this case very closely and keep you updated.
On this edition of Long (COVID) Story Short, our Dr. Been reviews a study in which researchers demonstrated that the use of Metformin within the first four days of COVID-19 symptoms reduced healthcare utilization and the incidence of long COVID.
The researchers write: “In conclusion, early outpatient COVID-19 treatment with metformin decreased the subsequent risk of long COVID by 41.3% during 10-month follow-up. This finding is consistent with the 42.3% reduction in healthcare utilization for severe COVID-19 with metformin in the first 14 days of the trial.” An important review to watch.
Did you know that approximately 42% of newly diagnosed cancers in the U.S. are potentially avoidable?
The goal of metabolic adjunctive treatments is to “starve the cancer cell” by changing energy pathways that are important to cancer cells. Simple adjuncts such as lifestyle changes, supplements, and drugs can help you manage cancer.
Watch this short video, 12 Metabolic Interventions to Control Cancer, HERE.
Wednesday’s FLCCC Weekly Webinar was a fascinating deep-dive discussion into ‘Astonishing Adaptogens’.
So…you may be asking, “What are adaptogens?” Furthermore, you may be wondering how can they help our health, and how can we best utilize them?
Host Betsy Ashton was joined this week by Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Kristina Carman and Dr. JP Saleeby on Wednesday for a webinar filled with crucial information for everyone concerned about managing the ill effects of stress using Adaptogens.
Nutritional specialist Dr. Kristina Carman told viewers that, “To define stress is really important. What it is physically in our body is a disturbance in an individual’s homeostasis. And the benefits of adaptogens (there’s many different types, so it’s really important to distinguish which one you’re using and why) can really support the body to adapt to these stressors.”
Dr. Saleeby added that, “There are three criteria to define what an adaptogen herb is. One, it cannot cause any kind of toxicity or disorder of any physiological function. Two, it has to increase the body’s resistance to stress by a wide mechanism of action. And three, most importantly, it must be able to normalize or reach homeostasis.”
Do your own deep dive on Adaptogens with these informative slides.
This woman was amazed at how quickly ivermectin helped her 83-year-old mother-in-law recover. A short MyStory that illustrates the power of this very effective, safe drug. Watch it HERE!
👁️ The Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded Monday to two biochemists who worked to develop what the committee called “effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19.” (Surprisingly, there was no mention of the thousands of adverse reactions —including deaths—linked to the vaccines.)
👁️ The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Sept. 11 licensing of Moderna’s “Spikevax” COVID-19 vaccine for children 12 and older could result in school and state mandates and injure millions, according to Dr. Meryl Nass. (“Spikevax”? Really? Is it a name—or a promise of adverse events to come?)
👁️ Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk for ischemic cardiovascular complications for up to 1 year after infection.
👁️ The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced it will phase out its COVID-19 vaccination cards. You know, the ones that were more like “Get Out of Jail Free Cards” — just in case you wanted to venture out your front door to pick up a loaf of bread.
👁️ In postmenopausal women, the risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding (i.e., postmenopausal bleeding) in the 4 weeks after COVID-19 vaccination was increased two to threefold, compared to a pre-vaccination period.
