FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance

“Why I Call Our Country the United States of Pharma”

Published On: September 18, 2022|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This is one serious takedown of the “criminal censorship” of ivermectin committed by high-impact medical journals. It is written by our über-courageous president and chief medical officer, Dr. Pierre Kory. If you can, stop what you’re doing right now and read this.

In this powerful essay, Dr. Kory quotes Dr. Marcia Angell, a former long-time Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). She writes:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

“Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, big Pharma uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers and the medical profession itself.”

Dr. Kory says that high-impact medical journal editorial staff members were getting orders to censor ivermectin studies from Big Pharma and “philanthropaths” like Bill Gates. And that, he says, is “why I call our country the United States of Pharma.”

Dr. Kory continues:

“Notice Dr. Angell mentions the FDA (although the NIH’s complicity is implied by the rest of the sentence). I have been saying since early in the pandemic that the United States Federal Health Agencies are (and have long been) in a state of ‘total regulatory capture.’

“Science is dead. Or at least any science that has financial implications against or for Pharma interests is dead. We need a parallel system of journals which have zero influence by Pharma. We need institutions we can trust and those journals are not. They are dead to me and Paul after careers of believing in everything they published.”

WOW. Just WOW.



DATES: October 14-16, 2022


  • Conference Fee: $395/per person (includes all presentations, continental breakfast and boxed lunches on Saturday 10/15 and Sunday 10/16)
  • Friday Evening VIP Networking Dinner: $125/per person (featuring Keynote Address by FLCCC co-founders Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik)

The FLCCC Alliance’s inaugural conference will convene the top experts in the field of pathology, evaluation, and treatment of spike-induced diseases. Lectures will focus on the pathogenesis of spike-induced diseases, diagnosing both long COVID and post-vaccine syndromes and the latest, most effective approaches to treatment. The conference will gather some of the nation’s foremost COVID experts and healthcare providers to learn, share and network — and most importantly to drive greater attention and awareness of the increasing number of patients afflicted with post-COVID and post-vaccine chronic conditions, many of whom are not getting treatment today.

Well, well, well. What do we have we here?

In a massive study from Brazil led by our Dr. Flavio Cadegiani— with co-authors Lucy Kerr, Fernando Baldi, Raysildo Lobo, Washington Luiz Assagra, Fernando Carlos Proença, Juan J. Chamie, Dr. Jennifer A. Hibberd and Dr. Pierre Kory—the non-use of ivermectin was shown to be associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.

The study, which looked at 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, demonstrated a 92% reduction on COVID mortality with the use of ivermectin. The results show a remarkable reduction in hospitalization and death.

As stunning as this study is, its results merely confirm, AGAIN, what dozens of peer-reviewed studies across the globe have already demonstrated.


WATCH this report on the study (from 41:00-46:00); and then look at the study and its results for yourself.

So is this a surprise? Nope. Not even a little bit.

Will it finally open people’s eyes to the irrefutable science? The cynic in us would say “Nope. Not even a little bit.” The ever-hopeful among us would say, “Maybe this time…for humanity’s sake.”

“It’s all a big fat lie. More precisely a big low-fat, high-carbohydrate lie.”

To say that this week’s FLCCC Weekly Webinar was a stunner is a gargantuan understatement.

Dr. Paul Marik shared his personal story of how he cured himself from being a Type 2 diabetic—captivating viewers with his journey and his extraordinary messages of self-health empowerment. “The common teaching is that Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease that can’t be cured,” said Dr. Marik. “This is false. They don’t want you to be cured. They want you to take medication forever, and their treatment is to lower your glucose with medication. Both of these are lies.”

Then, alongside our Dr. Joe Varon and host Betsy Ashton, Dr. Marik proceeded to show us the way to our own healthier lives. Even if you do not have Type 2 diabetes, you will learn from Dr. Marik and Dr. Varon how to avoid chronic illnesses through a deeper understanding of how to properly nourish and care for your body.

What happens when RNA, like an unwanted houseguest, simply won’t go away? New, ground breaking case reports demonstrate for the first time the evidence for SARS-COV-2 persistence. Our Dr. Been’s review is important viewing.


A new paper by Dr. Hideki Kakeya and Dr. Yoshihisa Matsumoto showing that the Omicron variant is highly likely a product of artificial genetic modification, has been accepted to a journal after two rounds of peer reviews. “Our paper doesn’t definitively say the Omicron is lab-made. It just says non-natural origin of the Omicron is highly likely. The point is that all the labs should be inspected when the possibility of non-natural origin is high,” said Dr. Kakeya. “The fact that the reviewers agree with our conclusion means a lot.”


On Substack, a writer called Snoops McGoo has offered up a plethora of screenshots of emails and internal communications that provide more proof that the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian federal government knew ivermectin to be a lifesaver when it comes to COVID. “Not only has the government failed in its duty to act in ensuring access to this cheap/safe drug, it withholds and maligns ivermectin,” says Snoops.


The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has obtained a court order requiring the CDC to release V-Safe data that includes over 137 million health entries following COVID-19 vaccinations.


Despite the CDC’s ability to immediately release this deidentified data pursuant to its own protocol, the CDC took the position that “the information in the app is not de-identified” and so it would not produce it.  Thus, in December 2021, ICAN sued.  ICAN also submitted an additional request to address the agency’s objection, demanding, “All data submitted to v-safe since January 1, 2020,” and when the CDC still refused to release the data, ICAN sued again.

Now, after months of litigation, the court has ordered that, by September 30, 2022, the CDC must produce the first batch of over 19 months’ worth of data collected from tens of millions of v-safe participants between December 14, 2020 and July 31, 2022!


Dr. Tess Lawrie—a medical doctor and research consultant based in the UK, and the CEO of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy—met Dr. Pierre Kory in person for the first time at the Better Way Conference in Vienna on Saturday (though the two have worked together for nearly two years.)

She proclaimed that, “Dr. Pierre Kory is the seed for great change,” citing his bravery throughout this pandemic.

If so, then, we proclaim that “Dr. Tess Lawrie is the sunlight that makes it grow.”

See the beautiful moment HERE.


In a compelling new SubstackThe Digger (aka Phil Harper) reviews Dr. Peter McCullough’s important new study, which presents evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signalingwith diverse adverse consequences to human health.

“Over the decades, we’ve morphed into a Science Sermon relationship where we’re given ‘The Science’ but we’re unable to credibly challenge it,” says Harper. “To change this, we must come to understand the data that sits behind the life and death decisions being made on our behalf. We must arm ourselves with knowledge so that tough questions can be asked of the advice we are given. Maybe it’s good advice, but we ought to check.

“Billions of lives are potentially at risk, given the large number of individuals injected with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines and the broad range of adverse outcomes we have described. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly.”

CONGRATULATIONS TO NICOLE LANDERS—our spotlight nurse of the month!

Nicole is part of a group of medical and legal professionals working together to advocate for the human rights of patients within hospitals and across the community. Thanks for all you do Nicole!

Andrea started her family on the I-MASK+ protocol (now updated to I-CARE) as soon as her husband tested positive for COVID. She shares how this led to mild symptoms and a quick recovery for all four of them!


Explore Similar Stories


Go to Top