FLCCC | Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance

“We Flew the Airplane While We Were Still Building It” — The FLCCC News Capsule for November 20, 2022

Published On: November 20, 2022|
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

It is not often (in fact, never before) that we lead off the FLCCC News Capsule by featuring a story that frankly makes our blood boil.

But we’re doing it today because it provides a window into the incomprehensible madness that was going on within pharmaceutical companies preceding the roll-out of the mRNA vaccines.

In a head-spinning interview in Nature with Kathrin Jansen, the recently retired head of vaccine R&D at Pfizer, we read in horror as she said this:

“We got creative — we couldn’t wait for data, we had to do so much ‘at risk’. We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it.”

Wait, WHAT? Does that sound safe to you? Flying an airplane while it’s still being built? That doesn’t sound safe to us at all.

And they “couldn’t wait for data?”

Dear, dear reader, if you read nothing more in this News Capsule today, please, in the name of humanity, read the following:

At the start of the pandemic, the highly published and world renowned physician/scholars of the FLCCC’s Critical Care team, under the brilliant leadership of Dr. Paul Marik, developed a protocol that was saving the lives of critically ill patients in the hospitals where it was being used. Our protocol achieved a 4-6% mortality rate. Hospitals NOT using the protocol had a 23%-80% mortality rate. But the FLCCC was dismissed, censored and shunned by mainstream medicine and major media because they insisted that we provide them with the DATA that proved our protocol’s safety and efficacy. No data? Well, then no saving the lives of people who we KNEW were dying unnecessarily. Our doctors used their deep knowledge of how the therapeutics worked, their clinical experience and sheer brilliance to allow their patients to walk out of the hospital and into the grateful arms of their families. Meanwhile other hospitals threw up their hands, waited for data, and chose instead to summon box trucks to haul away the dead through the back doors.

And then there was this from Kathrin Jansen:

“[In March 2020] when our CEO said, “Get it done before the end of the year,” I said, “This is crazy!” But money was not an issue — and, then, you can do amazing things in an amazing amount of time.”

Wait, WHAT? You mean just by throwing money at science, you can make it dance, sing and perform heretofore impossible scientific miracles for you? Like suddenly science can do a time hop over the months and years it has always taken to develop safe and effective vaccines? Wow. Gotta say, we didn’t know that. Groovy man, groovy.

And get this:

“Another reason the mRNA platform came out as the front-runner was that we think you can boost as much and as long as you want and not get immune responses to the vector itself — the mRNA.”

Wait, WHAT? You mean you KNEW that efficacy was going to quickly wane requiring booster after booster to protect people? Did you know enough about mRNA vaccines and their safety to support an endless flurry of boosters so definitively? So what’s it gonna be? A booster once a month? A week? Daily? Morning and night? There’s a lotta lettuce in those boo$ter$, right?


Here’s what she said next:

“But the mRNA platform wasn’t ready for prime time. There were stability issues, formulation issues, that we needed to solve. In 2020, it was only a research process and it needed to be scaled up. Usually, you start with a small reactor, and then you go to bigger and bigger reactors. We didn’t have time to do this. Instead, we just cloned this relatively small-scale research process many times and over multiple sites to get to the capacity to produce billions of doses.”

Wait, WHAT? The mRNA vaccines were NOT ready for prime time? Stability issues? Formulation issues? It was only a research process? Not even in the testing phase? And STILL you produced billions of doses using small scale research (your words) while rolling the dice on billions of lives?

Readers, you get it.

What we don’t get is why Nature ran this article as some kind of victory lap for Pfizer and Ms. Jansen when people lost their lives or sustained serious injuries because Pfizer/BioNTech flew an unfinished airplane. That they are now joyfully bragging about it, and somehow managed to convince Nature to fly with them too, is well beyond our comprehension.


There WAS a way to save people from dying that was cheap, globally available, super-safe and highly effective. But there was more money to be made in trotting out unfinished, unstable, barely tested, next-gen airplanes than there was in putting the key in the ignition of the most reliable car you’ve ever owned.

Read the whole story here. Let us know your take on this article in the comments. (Oh, and also let us know how your trip was on that first test flight and how you fared.)

New York Times Best-Selling author Michael Capuzzo—who with his wife Teresa writes the RESCUE Substack— frequently publishes the essays of our Dr. Pierre Kory, President and Chief Medical Officer of the FLCCC.

In this essay, Dr. Kory writes that during the pandemic, “government agencies stuck with their unceasing policy recommendations that were increasingly divorced from the science.” He points that out because now, those responsible for the catastrophic decisions that cost millions of people around the world their lives are asking for “amnesty” for the mistakes that were made. But amnesty without apologies and policy change is like asking for forgiveness while in the act of committing the same heinous acts.

As Mr. Capuzzo asks in his introduction, “Should humanity stick with the Hippocratic Oath or adopt Dr. Fauci’s revolutionary overthrow of that hoary pledge for new “science” which would require holding as less important the value of an individual human life?”

This essay, written by the unstoppable investigative journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer, should be on your reading list for today. Headlined, “Deep In The Wombs of Women: The Hidden Harm of Covid Vaccines”, Ms. Pfeiffer reports that worldwide, fewer babies are being born or born alive—while more women are experiencing fertility problems.

An organization based in Paris called, “Where’s My Cycle?” has received about 1,000 reports of concerning and bizarre abnormalities, like 20-year-olds in pre-menopause and 70-year-olds suddenly menstruating. The list of complaints is a veritable gynecological glossary of woe: amenorrhoea, menorrhagia, adenomyosis, endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, miscarriage, and hysterectomy.

These symptoms began, not coincidentally, at the start of 2021, when women put out their arms and took, or were coerced by employers to take, COVID-19 vaccinations.

An urgent read.

We are awaiting a decision from the court regarding the lawsuit filed by our Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Mary Bowden and Dr. Robert Apter against the FDA and the NIH. The complaint? It’s about how the FDA managed to break with both law and tradition by interfering with “the practice of medicine.” (The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which was passed by Congress in 1938, specifically prohibits the FDA from interfering “with the authority of a health-care practitioner to prescribe” drugs approved for human use.)

The FDA’s Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 webpage is the agency’s anti-ivermectin cornerstone. And its Tweets about the use of ivermectin to treat COVID achieved viral status.

Writes author Linda Bonvie on Medium, “Despite the doctors having a nearly 100 percent survival rate for the thousands of patients they treated and consulted with for COVID, the fact that they endorsed ivermectin had a devastating effect on their medical careers.”

***OMG. GET THIS:***

Lawyers for the FDA told the court during a hearing on the case earlier this month that the FDA telling people to “stop” taking ivermectin for COVID-19 was informal and just a recommendation.


You mean saying things like, “Stop it. Stop it with the ivermectin,” and telling people not to take IVM to prevent or treat COVID was just informal? Just a recommendation? Check this out from yesterday’s article in the Epoch Times:

The FDA created a webpage in 2021 titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and later posted a link to the page on Twitter while writing: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” A second post stated: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

In a separate page, the FDA said: “Q: Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? A: No.”

For illustration purposes, here is one of their Tweets on the subject:

Sorry, you can’t have it both ways, FDA. You can’t say those things and then trot into court and say you didn’t say those things. The above is Exhibit A. See? You said those things.

We’ll keep you updated on this case as the judge’s ruling on the FDA’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit is expected soon.

A new Substack from the amazing Alexandros Marinos outlines the many design features the ACTIV-6 and TOGETHER Trials have in common, including issues with randomization, dosing, missing data and more.

Oh, check out Alexandros’ new Twitter thread posted just this morning that we believe will really capture your attention…

Hmmm…we smell a rat. In fact, we detect the odor of thousands of them—mostly all rabid.

Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory joined host Betsy Ashton to discuss the rise in Flu, RSV and COVID-19 cases—and how you can prepare your family for them. Watch the webinar HERE—including the Q&A from viewers!

And don’t forget…there will be NO FLCCC Weekly Webinar on Wednesday, November 23. Like many of you, we will be in full Thanksgiving mode!

Happy Thanksgiving to one and all from everyone at the FLCCC!

“The simultaneous rise of online censorship with unprecedented influence of pharmaceutical corporations has created a new era of medicine and medical research… It will not be good for American patients,” writes Dr. John Hughes in American Thinker. “The major danger is that this tactic will be repeated in the next pandemic and doctors will again be told to prescribe nothing until an expensive designer drug from the company that has provided more ad revenue to TV than any other company saves the day.”

BRAVO, Dr. Hughes. BRAVO!

Our Dr. Been discusses damaged protein recycling for the management of inflammatory diseases in this edition of Long (COVID) Story Short.

“In this era of inflammatory state, we all will suffer either from the SARS-COV-2 or vaccines in some, it becomes critically important to understand the mechanisms that are disrupted resulting in the chronic inflammation, said Dr. Been. “This understanding enables a provider to think about the management. This talk will empower you to manage your patients with chronic inflammatory conditions more successfully.”

While this talk is geared towards providers, please watch it to know what you need to discuss with your doctor.

For The Record #2. In this episode, Dr. Andrew Johnstone puts his patient’s experience on record.

It isn’t misinformation. It isn’t a lie. It is simply a truthful account by Dr. Johnstone. WATCH IT HERE.

“No one should have to die to shore up hospital profits,” said Dr. Johnstone.

A woman from Kansas researched ivermectin on the FLCCC website. She obtained the info she needed twice — once for COVID and a second time for prophylaxis. But it isn’t so easy to follow the FLCCC protocols when your family has a very different point of view on how to treat COVID. But follow our protocols she did. (Happily!) Watch her story now.

Dr. Been welcomes our Dr. Keith Berkowitz for a discussion on the management of acute COVID infections and testing to Long COVID and more.


Dr. Pierre Kory appeared on the Dr. Drew program to discuss Dr. Emily Oster’s Atlantic article pushing for “pandemic amnesty” for the mistakes that were made by health authorities during COVID— and his response to that article.


Australian health officials said they will not make any changes to their existing recommendations for COVID-19 boosters — meaning they won’t recommend a third booster (fifth dose) for any age group, despite rising case and hospitalization numbers.


Renowned DJ, composer, and songwriter Tyson Illingworth discusses his vaccine injury journey with a guest post on Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack.

“Never in my wildest dreams or more precisely my nightmares did I expect that I would find myself where I am today, instead of touring and being interviewed for my latest show, track or album, I am receiving daily media invitations to talk about my fight to regain my health after being injured and paralyzed by the Moderna vaccine.”


Dr. E.V. Rapiti is a family physician who has treated over 3,000 COVID patients. Recently, he wrote in BizNews that, “After Covid, l discovered to my utter shock and horror that many professors, editors of prestigious journals and medical institutions, for the last fifty years, were cheap surrogates of the big pharmaceutical industries and highly corrupt but influential wealthy individuals like Bill Gates, George Soros, Jeff Bezos.

“They all punted the narrative that Covid was an extremely dangerous disease, for which there was no treatment and that the vaccines were tried and tested to make them extremely safe and effective. This, we learnt, was an absolute lie.”

Explore Similar Stories

Go to Top